Juan Pablo Canas Garcia vs Ramy Labna Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L L W L
Form
L L L L W W W L L LHead-To-Head: Garcia 1 - 0 Labna
They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia winning 2 and Labna winning 0. The last match between Garcia and Labna was at the Spain F22 (Pozoblanco), 04-08-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Juan Pablo Canas Garcia getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juan Pablo Canas Garcia | 1 |
| Ramy Labna | 0 |
Spain F22 (Pozoblanco)(04-08-2018)
6
1
6
2
| Garcia | Stats | Labna |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 28 | Age | 34 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (203-162) | Career Total W/L | 35% (44-82) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Guy Den Heijer
Player
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia
Player
Fabio Coelho
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Canas Garcia
Player
Peter Sychev
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ramy Labna Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bresciani
Player
Ramy Labna
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
90%
(
45 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (203/162) | Win/Loss | 35% (44/82) |
| 55% (435/356) | Sets Win/Loss | 37% (100/173) |
| 52% (3633/3328) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (1042/1297) |
| 60% (99/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 29% (10/24) |
| 52% (104/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (34/58) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 55 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 126 | Total Double Faults | 31 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 304.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 227.4 |
| 68% (3248/4770) | 1st Serve % | 61% (191/314) |
| 57% (1852/3248) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (102/191) |
| 46% (696/1522) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (44/123) |
| 45% (214/475) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 41% (1873/4586) | Return Points Win % | 29% (78/268) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (4/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (199/158) | Futures W/L | 35% (44/81) |
| 55% (196/355) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 34% (42/122) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (24/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (9/22) |
| 49% (34/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 89% (210/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (47/40) |
| 11% (210/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (47/7) |
| 10% (154/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (79/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
